In a recent speech about presentation skills, a local politician made this statement, โThe most important part of your presentation is your appearance.โ ย What?? When I heard that, I wanted to scream!
Turns out, his statement is based on misinterpretation of a long-held belief about communication. His ignorance of the facts led to bad advice. Before you hear why, itโs important to understand the root of this incorrectย information.
In 1968, Dr. Alfred Mehrabian published a study about how people communicate โsilentlyโ through emotion and attitude. If you havenโt heard of Dr. Mehrabian, you may be familiar with a statistic that claims โonly 7% of communication is the words you use.โ
This is a commonly accepted โfactโ among many speakers. It has led many to focus on their delivery skills, at the expense of their messages.
Thereโs only one problem. Dr. Mehrabian never wrote that โonly 7% of communication is the words you use.โ In his original studies, when test subjects received inconsistent messages [for example, a person told them โI love youโ, but had crossed arms, a scowl on her face, and said the words in an angry tone], the subjects interpreted the message more from the body language and tone of voice, rather than the words.
Dr. Mehrabian showed that, given an inconsistent message, people will believe the non-verbals messages rather than the words 93% of the time. Thatโs it. Nowhere does he claim that โonly 7% of communication is the words you use.โ ย His findings teach us that, given a mixed message, we’ll tend to be leave the speaker’s body or voice before their words.
With that in mind, letโs revisit our politician friend.ย His claim about the importance of appearance is laughable at best, but worse, it can hurt peopleโs careers or reputations. Perhaps in the sound-bite world of politics, appearance is all that matters.
If you give a speech or sell a product,ย though, words and concepts matter. Early in my career, when I gave a speech, I focused on delivery and appearanceโฆand made almost no connection with audiences.ย They didn’t buy into my messages, and they certainly didnโt buy the services I was selling.ย My career was held back because I was focused on the wrong part of communication.
It wasnโt until I learned how to create substantive messages, and deliver them in an authentic manner, that I made connections with people and impacted their lives when I presented a speech.
If Iโm to believe that appearance is the most important part of communicating, this means that when Dr. King stood on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial and spoke to a quarter of a million people, his words didn’t really matter as long as he was well-dressed and spoke confidently with a deep voice. He didn’t need to say, โI Have a Dream.โ
I donโt think so.
Am I saying appearance is not important? Absolutely not. However, if you want to make a long-lasting impression, what you say is vital. When people hear a meaningful talk delivered with authenticity, theyโll pick up the congruity of the message and the messenger. Theyโll remember that long after they remember your appearance.
EDUCATIONAL RESOURCE OF THE WEEK
As a follow-up to this article if you ‘d like to hear more about this subject from Dr. Mehrabian himself, click here.
Michaelโs mission is to help leaders, managers and sales professionals communicate with more confidence, impact, and influence. This passion is born from his own communication difficulties early in his career.
Fortunately, he discovered that public speaking is like riding a bike, swimming or driving a car - itโs a learnable skill. Once he discovered this โsecretโ he became a voracious student of the craft. He took courses, studied some of the worldโs best speakers and storytellers and continues to study presentation and business storytelling skills.
He is hired by companies and organizations, leaders, managers and sales professionals, and TEDx speakers to help them become more confident, impactful and influential communicators.
Address:
Phone: 
I agree with the idea that tone of voice and body language convey a big part of a speaker’s message but, I have to wonder about that 7% theory. I know Dr. Mehrabian did good research and much testing but, how do you reliably quantify something like that, anyway? Is there some kind of a “Speech O Meter” that you can hook a speaker up to and read a dial or computer screen that tells when you they are performing at 85% of their vocal capacity instead of 76%? Of course, no such thing exists.
Many years ago in “Rhetoric” Aristotle wrote that there were three elements of a good speech: “Logos” (A good logical argument), “Ethos” (The speaker’s experience, education and reputation) and, “Pathos” (emotional appeal). He said this is like a 3 legged stool. If one of the legs is missing or weak, the stool will tip over.
Excellent questions David. I wholeheartedly agree that voice and body are critical to communication. My biggest concern about the misinterpretation of the 7% number is that many so-called communication experts have used this number to discount the importance of the words we use. If words were so un-important, then great speeches like ‘The Gettysburg Address’, ‘I Have a Dream’, and JFK’s inaugural would have been long forgotten.